ORIGAMI - Why Church Should Be a Place Of Participation

Various origami laid on a table

In an experiment conducted in 2011, participants created Origami in a bid to assess the validity of “The IKEA Effect” – that people place a greater value on things that they have created, or expended effort on, than on things that were pre-built, or build by someone else, even if the pre-made items were of a higher quality.

The participants created either an origami crane or frog, and were then asked how much they would pay for it.

A group of experts also created origami.

A group of non-participants were asked how much they would pay for the non-expert and expert origami.

The participants assessed their own work at around 23 cents, whilst the non-participants assessed the same origami at around 5 cents. Finally the non-participants assessed the experts origami at around 27 cents.


From this we can see that the participants assessed their own work (basically scrunched up paper) as being almost the same value as the origami that the experts made, even when outsiders assessed the same origami as almost worthless.

It is worth noting that this finding was the same for utilitarian products and hedonic products.

What does this mean for the Church?

People Own What They Help To Create

Emerging within the church is a slow backlash against the perfectionism of the Sunday service; the professionalism, and a movement towards more organic church. This is seen in the light of the passivity of the congregation in those services.

Church is about empowering the people of God to build the kingdom of God on earth as it is in heaven.

We must create spaces where people can be involved in a meaningful way within the life of the congregation.

We must place the tools in their hands that allow them to sculpt a better world.

We must help them to see the beauty in what they create.

We draw people in not by putting on a flashy show, but instead by involving them in the creative, messy process of building the kingdom of God.

A Word of Warning

In the same experiments listed above was another set of experiments, whereby people created something, then un-created it, or where people did not finish the thing that they had started. In those experiments there was no value attached to the things that were created.

When we empower people we must also support them. When we consult people we must actually listen to them (instead of just do the opposite regardless of what they said).

 So

May we empower people, may equip people, and may we help them to build the kingdom of God.

Photo by Dev Benjamin on Unsplash

Comments

Post a Comment

* indicates required

Popular posts from this blog

If God is All Good and All Powerful, Why Does Suffering Exist?

Image
Philosopher Alvin Plantinga called the problem of suffering “the only good objection to God”. The often quoted argument goes:  “if God is all good (all benevolent) then God has the desire to end suffering, and if God is all-powerful (omnipotent) then God has the ability to end suffering. Therefore if God does not end suffering, then God is either not all good, or is not all-powerful, and is therefore not God”. As Christians, we need to be able to answer this objection to God, to enable us to “give a reason for the faith that we have in Christ Jesus” (1 Peter 3:15). To this end, I want to try and answer this question to help anybody who finds the problem of suffering to be a sticking point or an obstacle in their faith (an argument to explain the problem of suffering is called a “theodicy”). To begin with, I want to go back to the beginning of it all and look at God. Who is God and what is God like? It is worth noting here that this argument takes as given the fact
Keep reading

The Surprising Truth About The Differences Between The Temptation Narratives of Matthew and Luke and What They Teach Us About Overcoming Temptation

Image
  5 MINUTE READ We are now well into Lent , one of the two great fasts in the Christian Calendar ( along with Advent ). Lent is the time when we contemplate Christ’s sacrifice, along with Christ’s 40 days of temptation in the wilderness. When we give up things for Lent we find ourselves tempted in similar, yet far less extreme, circumstances (Let’s be honest, who wants to hang out in the wilderness by themselves for 40 days and eat and drink nothing; I can barely handle giving up chocolate!). Much writing during this time consists of looking at the temptations of Jesus, and how Jesus overcame them as a template for our own overcoming of temptations. But in this post, I do not intend to look at the traditional views, but rather to look at the differences between how Matthew and Luke told the story of Christ’s temptation and what we can learn from these differences. Let’s look at them now. Why Differences are OK We do not like to discuss differences in acco
Keep reading

SANDWICHES - Enhance Your Reading of Mark's Gospel

Image
As followers of Christ, we look to the Bible as one of our main sources of inspiration and guides in our lives. So it follows that we all want our times reading the Bible to be as rich as possible. Learning more about the Bible is one way to help with this. It is particularly helpful when we know the types of things that the authors of the books used to aid us in this task. To this end I wanted to talk about something that has enriched my reading of the gospel of Mark: Markan Sandwiches (also called interpolations ). Essentially, what Mark does is get one story within his gospel, and inserts it inside another story ; this serves the purpose of giving both stories a greater sense of meaning. It’s purpose is to make the reader stop and think “Mark is trying to tell us something important here”. In practice it looks like this: Story 1 – Introduction Story 2 – Introduction & Conclusion Story 1 – Conclusion We can see where the idea of the sandwich comes f
Keep reading